{"id":9455,"date":"2016-10-17T11:16:17","date_gmt":"2016-10-17T15:16:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/qa.bluevaultpartners.com\/?post_type=insights&p=9455"},"modified":"2016-10-22T11:33:09","modified_gmt":"2016-10-22T15:33:09","slug":"economies-of-scale-in-nontraded-reit-offerings-and-effects-of-fee-discounts","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/qa.bluevaultpartners.com\/economies-of-scale-in-nontraded-reit-offerings-and-effects-of-fee-discounts\/","title":{"rendered":"Economies of Scale in Nontraded REIT Offerings and Effects of Fee Discounts"},"content":{"rendered":"

Economies of Scale in Nontraded REIT Offerings and Effects of Fee Discounts<\/h1>\n

\"Equity<\/p>\n

Two complicating factors that must be considered in the analysis of fees associated with nontraded REIT offerings are:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Economies of scale resulting from that portion of fees and\/or expenses that are fixed or constant over a relevant range of offering proceeds<\/li>\n
  2. Selling commission discounts available to investors for larger investments (commonly known as \u201cvolume discounts\u201d or \u201cprice breaks\u201d)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    Economies of Scale in Organization & Offering Expenses<\/h4>\n

    We can illustrate the first example by looking at the language in a typical prospectus that details the Organization & Offering Expenses to be reimbursed to the advisor. For the year ended December 31, 2015, one nontraded REIT recorded Organization and Offering Expenses incurred by the REIT\u2019s advisor on behalf of the REIT that it was obligated to pay at $4.6 million. During that same period, the offering had raised $470.4 million in aggregate gross proceeds. At that stage of the offering, therefore, the Organization & Offering Expenses totaled 0.97% of gross offering proceeds. In the same filing, the prospectus states that \u201cOther Organization and Offering Expenses\u201d are projected to be 0.55% of public offering proceeds with the \u201cMaximum Sale of Class A Shares in the Offering\u201d and 0.86% of public offering proceeds with a \u201cHalf Offering\u201d or 50% of the total offering authorized.<\/p>\n

    Looking at the numbers, there is a \u201cfixed cost\u201d component of Organization & Offering Expenses that will be spread over the total offering proceeds, resulting in what economists refer to as \u201ceconomies of scale,\u201d meaning those expenses will be a lower percentage of the total offering proceeds as that total increases. It is not unusual for a nontraded REIT offering to fall far short of the total offering proceeds that are stated in the prospectus. In the above example, the REIT had raised aggregate proceeds of $530.9 million as of September 30, 2016, with a closing date of March 31, 2017, just six months away. Thus, the REIT had raised just under 40% of the authorized $1.4 billion, and less than 5% of the $1.4 billion over the first nine months in 2016. It is not unreasonable to doubt that the Organization & Offering Expenses estimated as a percentage of the offering proceeds will approach the low estimate of 0.55%, and it is more likely that, due to the fixed component of those expenses and the slowing of capital raise, they will be more than 0.86%.<\/p>\n

    Another example is in a the recently closed offering that had raised $678.0 million, including DRIP proceeds as of September 17, 2016, the date it terminated the offering. The offering prospectus dated August 28, 2013, stated that the REIT expected to reimburse its advisor a total of $59.5 million for both underwriting expenses and other organization and offering expenses if it raised the maximum offering proceeds of $2.975 million including DRIP. These expenses were expected to be 2.0% of gross offering proceeds for any level of offering proceeds, and the 2.0% was given for the minimum offering proceeds as well as the maximum offering proceeds, implying that there was no fixed component in those expenses that would be reimbursed to the sponsor. The prospectus language was: \u201cAll other organization and offering expenses associated with the sale of the Company\u2019s common stock (excluding selling commissions and dealer manager fees) are paid by [the Advisor] or its affiliates and are reimbursed by the Company up to 2.0% of aggregate gross offering proceeds.\u201d Given this language in the prospectus, there would be no economies of scale expected for the REIT with regard to these expenses. Several months before this offering closed, more than 2.0% of the gross proceeds for organization and offering expenses had been paid by the advisor and were to be reimbursed by the REIT, up to the 2.0% limit.<\/p>\n

    Selling Commission Discounts Available to Investors<\/h4>\n

    The actual percentage of gross offering proceeds that will be paid as selling commissions will depend upon the discounts available to investors for different subscription amounts, as well as the portion of the offering that consists of DRIP proceeds (distributions reinvested for which there is no selling commission charged). A sliding scale of selling commissions for volume purchases will look like the\u00a0following:<\/p>\n

    \"commissiondiscount_table_lg\"<\/p>\n

    The discount is applied as a reduced effective purchase price per share and does not affect the net proceeds per share to the REIT in this example. The total selling commissions paid for any offering will be the result of the actual mix of purchases by subscription size. In the above example, the 7.00% commission level would only be accurate for the completed offering if all subscriptions were for less than $500,000 and no DRIP proceeds were received. With this in mind, investors who receive a selling commission discount or who pay no selling commission on their DRIP investments will experience a higher average rate of return from their investments over the life of the REIT program than those investors who pay the highest selling commission rate of 7.00%.<\/p>\n

    Returning to the offering in the previous example, the REIT\u2019s estimate of the percentage of public offering proceeds to be paid as selling commissions is less than the 7.0% rate due to the category of investor or volume discounts available. Using assumptions made by the adviser for the sales mix, the prospectus estimates the selling commission percentage as 6.77% of proceeds from Class A shares and just less than 2.00% for Class T shares.<\/p>\n

    Conclusion<\/h4>\n

    When we analyze the fees paid by nontraded REITs as selling commissions or any other expenses related to their offerings, it is important to keep in mind that there may be:<\/p>\n